Course Reflection
One of the most significant challenges that face the communication process is making decisions that are not based on rational reasoning. Critical thinking is a crucial element that can help one make the most critical decisions. Unfortunately, many people rarely understand the benefit of asking questions and critical thinking in the decision-making process. The first discussion opened my mind to the wrong decisions I have made in the past since I had no established steps in assessing my decisions and how they would affect me in the future. I have gained numerous experiences and critical thinking skills from this course. First, I now understand the various critical thinking techniques that I can utilize in the thinking process. For instance, using the deduction technique in reasoning can help one compare several premises before coming up with a reasonable conclusion (Huber, 2017).
Also, I have learned of several types of questions to ask before making a decision. Another critical area that has enhanced my critical thinking and reasoning is the three case studies assigned in this course. Each case provided me with the opportunity to read through several real-life scenarios and make conclusions based on the identified reasoning patterns. Initially, I faced some challenges in answering the case-based questions but conducted additional research to better understand the questions. However, Browne and Keeley’s text provided me with adequate information that helped in the courses. Generally, the cases have helped me to understand issues and the conclusions that can be drawn from the issues. I also have a better understanding of reasons, assumptions, and fallacies in the reasoning process. Today, people will always have divided opinions on debates and why they believe, certain things should be done their way.
For instance, reading through the Vermont debate on compulsory vaccination of children, I applied the reasoning skills to evaluate different opinions presented by most parents on why they oppose vaccinating children. However, dichotomous thinking played a significant role in their decisions, and it was evident that it would be impossible to establish a vast area in the debate. Dichotomous thinking might have harsh consequences, primarily when the issue under deliberation affects human health. Critical thinking and practical reasoning are the way to go. Making decisions without proper analysis and comparison of events can lead to improper decision making. Organizations ad other institutions should also promote critical thinking to ensure efficiency and increased productivity due to effective decision making.
Reference
Huber, F. (2017). On the justification of deduction and induction. European Journal for
Philosophy of Science, 7(3), 507-534.